Claim adjustment reason code
CO-96: Non-covered charges
CO-96 means: Non-covered charge(s). At least one Remark Code must be provided (may be comprised of either the NCPDP Reject Reason Code, or Remittance Advice Remark Code that is not an ALERT.) The plan does not cover this service at all. Distinct from medical necessity, which is an argument about evidence.
Read the group code before you act on this
96 is the reason. The CO in front of it is the group code, a separate field on the remittance, and it is the one that decides who owes the money: CO means contractual obligation — the payer says the amount is not billable to anybody, and it is written off unless the denial itself is overturned. You may not bill the patient. What the other group codes mean.
What causes CO-96?
- The service is genuinely excluded from the plan — cosmetic, experimental, or outside the benefit
- The service is covered but was billed under a code the plan excludes
- A carved-out benefit administered by a different organization entirely
- Statutory exclusion under Medicare, which no appeal will overturn
How do you fix a CO-96 denial?
- Read the RARC. CO-96 alone does not distinguish an exclusion from a coding problem, and those have opposite remedies
- Confirm whether an Advance Beneficiary Notice was obtained. Without one you generally cannot bill a Medicare patient for a statutorily excluded service
- If it is a carve-out, find the administering organization and rebill there — this is often behavioral health, dental or vision
- Read the GROUP code before doing anything with the balance. PR-96 is patient responsibility and billable; CO-96 is a contractual write-off and is not. The same CARC arrives under either group depending on the payer and the reason
Can CO-96 be prevented?
Eligibility verification that records the plan type, not merely that coverage is active, catches most of these before the visit.
A denial like this one is the recurring cost that medical billing outsourcing is built to take off your desk — a dedicated seat working the queue instead of it waiting for whoever has a free hour.
Who does this work
A eligibility & benefits verification seat at $1,700 per seat per month works this queue full time, during your business hours, inside your own system. Every call is logged with the payer reference number and the outcome, and every Friday you get it in writing.
Codes worked the same way
CO-96 is appealed with clinical documentation. So are these, which is why a queue sorted by recovery route moves faster than one sorted by code number — the same person, in the same system, with the same evidence to hand, clears all of them in one pass.
- CO-50 — Not deemed medically necessary
- CO-151 — Too many services billed
- CO-170 — Provider type not paid
- CO-234 — Not paid separately
- CO-236 — Modifier combination not allowed
- CO-231 — Mutually exclusive procedures
Specialties that name this among their costliest
These are specialties whose own worst denials include one of this kind. The line under each is the denial they name, quoted from their page so you can see what the link is based on.
- Pain ManagementRFA denied because the chart does not carry percent relief and duration from both diagnostic blocks
- OrthopedicsImplant and hardware charges denied for missing invoice documentation
- Behavioral HealthTime-based psychotherapy codes not supported by documented duration
- CardiologyStress tests denied for medical necessity documentation
- PodiatryAt-risk foot care documentation not naming the treating physician for the systemic condition
- Physical TherapyTimed code units not supported by documented treatment minutes
What leaving it costs
Working a denied claim costs $57.23 per denied claim in administrative time (source) — before any of it is recovered, and whether or not it ever is.
Payers ultimately pay roughly 90% of claims even while using an initial denial to slow payment (source), so the reason one sits is rarely that nobody knows how to work it. Put your own denial count in.
Questions
What does denial code CO-96 mean?
Non-covered charge(s). At least one Remark Code must be provided (may be comprised of either the NCPDP Reject Reason Code, or Remittance Advice Remark Code that is not an ALERT.) In plain terms: The plan does not cover this service at all. Distinct from medical necessity, which is an argument about evidence.
What causes CO-96?
The service is genuinely excluded from the plan — cosmetic, experimental, or outside the benefit. The service is covered but was billed under a code the plan excludes. A carved-out benefit administered by a different organization entirely. Statutory exclusion under Medicare, which no appeal will overturn.
How do you fix a CO-96 denial?
Read the RARC. CO-96 alone does not distinguish an exclusion from a coding problem, and those have opposite remedies. Confirm whether an Advance Beneficiary Notice was obtained. Without one you generally cannot bill a Medicare patient for a statutorily excluded service. If it is a carve-out, find the administering organization and rebill there — this is often behavioral health, dental or vision. Read the GROUP code before doing anything with the balance. PR-96 is patient responsibility and billable; CO-96 is a contractual write-off and is not. The same CARC arrives under either group depending on the payer and the reason.
Can CO-96 be prevented?
Eligibility verification that records the plan type, not merely that coverage is active, catches most of these before the visit.
Is CO-96 the same as PR-96?
Same reason, different group code. The number 96 is the reason: The plan does not cover this service at all. Distinct from medical necessity, which is an argument about evidence. The prefix says who carries the amount. CO means contractual obligation — the payer says the amount is not billable to anybody, and it is written off unless the denial itself is overturned. PR-96 is the same reason assigned to patient responsibility — the payer says the amount is owed by the patient, and it is billed to them. Read the prefix before the number: it decides whether you appeal, write off, or bill the patient.
What is the difference between CO-96 and CO-97?
CO-96: The plan does not cover this service at all. Distinct from medical necessity, which is an argument about evidence. CO-97: The payer is bundling this code into another one on the same claim. Sometimes that is correct and sometimes it is not. They are different reasons that happen to sit next to each other in the list, and they are worked differently — CO-96 is appealed with clinical documentation; CO-97 is worked at the edit pair, with a modifier only where the record supports one.
Code descriptions are the standard X12 claim adjustment reason and remittance advice remark code text. Payer policies differ, and the payer’s own coverage policy governs any individual claim. This page is working guidance, not legal or clinical advice.
Last updated 2026-09-14. This is operational guidance drawn from payer remittance practice, not legal, coding or reimbursement advice. Payer-specific rules vary and change; confirm against the payer’s own policy before acting on a specific claim.
Other denial codes
- PR-204 — Not covered under the patient’s current plan
- CO-109 — Not covered by this payer or contractor
- CO-167 — Diagnosis is not covered
- CO-256 — Service not payable under the managed care contract
- CO-15 — Authorization number missing or invalid
- CO-288 — Referral absent
- Why insurers deny claims, and which denials are worth fighting
- How to overturn a timely filing denial
- Modifier 26 and TC: who bills which half
Next step
Is CO-96 one of the denials costing you most?
Send a ninety-day denial report and an aged AR summary, with no patient identifiers. Within two working days you get a written summary of which denial reasons are costing you most and what is recoverable.
Or write to ops@softhomeglobal.com

