Claim adjustment reason code
CO-24: Charges covered under a capitation agreement
CO-24 means: Charges are covered under a capitation agreement/managed care plan. The payer says this service is included in a capitated arrangement, so there is no separate fee-for-service payment.
Read the group code before you act on this
24 is the claim adjustment reason code. The CO in front of it is the group code — a separate field the payer sets on the remittance. The same reason code arrives under different group codes depending on the payer and the situation, and the group code, not the reason code, decides who owes the money.
- CO — contractual obligation. You write it off. You may not bill the patient.
- PR — patient responsibility. Billable to the patient.
- OA — other adjustment, and PI — payer initiated reduction. Neither is patient responsibility.
What causes it
- Patient enrolled in a managed care plan the practice did not know about
- Claim sent to the wrong entity — the plan rather than the capitated group, or the reverse
- The service genuinely falls inside a capitation arrangement the practice holds
- Eligibility check did not surface the managed care assignment
How to work it
- Check eligibility for the date of service and identify which entity carries the risk.
- If the patient is assigned to a capitated group, bill that group under its own process rather than resubmitting to the payer.
- If the practice holds the capitation, the balance is not billable and belongs in a contractual adjustment — read the group code before moving anything.
- If the assignment is wrong, escalate to the payer’s provider relations with the eligibility record.
How to stop it recurring
Check managed care assignment at eligibility, not just active coverage. Assignment changes monthly and is invisible on a card.
Who does this work
A eligibility & benefits verification seat at $1,700 per seat per month works this queue full time, during your business hours, inside your own system. Every call is logged with the payer reference number and the outcome, and every Friday you get it in writing.
Codes worked the same way
CO-24 is fixed at coordination of benefits and rebilled. So are these, which is why a queue sorted by recovery route moves faster than one sorted by code number — the same person, in the same system, with the same evidence to hand, clears all of them in one pass.
- CO-22 — May be covered by another payer
- CO-27 — Coverage had already ended
- CO-109 — Wrong payer or contractor
- CO-119 — Benefit maximum reached
- PR-31 — Patient not found as insured
- CO-32 — Not an eligible dependent
Specialties that name this among their costliest
These are specialties whose own worst denials include one of this kind. The line under each is the denial they name, quoted from their page so you can see what the link is based on.
- Behavioral HealthAdd-on codes billed without the primary service
- PodiatryOrthotics denied for coverage exclusion
- Obstetrics & GynecologyCoverage checked once at the first prenatal visit and never rechecked, so the delivery claim months later goes to a plan the patient has already left.
- Urgent CareCoverage taken from whatever card the walk-in hands over at the desk and never checked against the plan, so the claim goes to a policy the patient left months ago
- Primary CareLow-dollar denials — the patient assigned to a different primary care provider, a wrong place of service — left in the queue as not worth the call, then aged past timely filing.
- Clinical Laboratory and PathologyTests denied for a diagnosis not on the coverage policy's approved list
What leaving it costs
Working a denied claim costs $57.23 per denied claim in administrative time. Source. At 100 denials a month — an illustration, not a measurement of your practice — that is $5,723 a month, or $68,676 a year, in labour alone.
The figure that makes it worth spending: about 90% of initially denied claims are eventually paid. Source. The reason a denial sits is almost never that nobody knows how to work it — it is that nobody has the hours.
Questions
What does denial code CO-24 mean?
Charges are covered under a capitation agreement/managed care plan. In plain terms: The payer says this service is included in a capitated arrangement, so there is no separate fee-for-service payment.
What causes CO-24?
Patient enrolled in a managed care plan the practice did not know about. Claim sent to the wrong entity — the plan rather than the capitated group, or the reverse. The service genuinely falls inside a capitation arrangement the practice holds. Eligibility check did not surface the managed care assignment.
How do you fix a CO-24 denial?
Check eligibility for the date of service and identify which entity carries the risk.. If the patient is assigned to a capitated group, bill that group under its own process rather than resubmitting to the payer.. If the practice holds the capitation, the balance is not billable and belongs in a contractual adjustment — read the group code before moving anything.. If the assignment is wrong, escalate to the payer’s provider relations with the eligibility record..
Can CO-24 be prevented?
Check managed care assignment at eligibility, not just active coverage. Assignment changes monthly and is invisible on a card.
Is CO-24 the same as PR-24?
Same reason, different group code. The number 24 is the reason: The payer says this service is included in a capitated arrangement, so there is no separate fee-for-service payment. The prefix says who carries the amount. CO means contractual obligation — the payer says the amount is not billable to anybody, and it is written off unless the denial itself is overturned. PR-24 is the same reason assigned to patient responsibility — the payer says the amount is owed by the patient, and it is billed to them. Read the prefix before the number: it decides whether you appeal, write off, or bill the patient.
What about the codes next to CO-24?
CO-23 and CO-25 are separate codes and this site does not yet cover them. The authoritative list is the X12 Claim Adjustment Reason Codes at x12.org/codes/claim-adjustment-reason-codes; a code is only described here once its official text, causes and fix have been written and checked.
Code descriptions are the standard X12 claim adjustment reason and remittance advice remark code text. Payer policies differ, and the payer’s own coverage policy governs any individual claim. This page is working guidance, not legal or clinical advice.
Last updated 2026-09-12. This is operational guidance drawn from payer remittance practice, not legal, coding or reimbursement advice. Payer-specific rules vary and change; confirm against the payer’s own policy before acting on a specific claim.
Other denial codes
- CO-109 — Not covered by this payer or contractor
- CO-256 — Service not payable under the managed care contract
- PR-204 — Not covered under the patient’s current plan
- CO-170 — Payment denied for this provider type
- PR-31 — Patient cannot be identified as our insured
- CO-288 — Referral absent
- How to find payer underpayments nobody is looking for
- The prior authorization checklist that prevents CO-197
- How long can a payer take to decide a prior authorization?
Next step
Somebody to work your CO-24 queue
Full time, US hours, inside your system. Twenty minutes on a call is enough to tell whether it pays for itself.
Or write to ops@softhomeglobal.com

